65l bucket is soooo much simpler.
]]>Grown from < £1M to ~£10M in 5 years.
Sick in the beginning was ad-hoc - rules say SSP only, but if you're not taking piss (as someone had previously, hence crap policy), they would just ignore SSP and pay you normally if you were off a few days.
]]>no, comms are not garbled. I joined the company very early on, my employee number is 13. We are now > 100, and grown from <£1M turnover to about £10M in 5 years. I really needed a job at the time, and sickpay was very ad-hoc, along the lines of "we don't pay company sick, it's just SSP, because someone was taking the piss", and a blind eye was given to decent employees being off sick - it was just ignored for payroll, and no hardship ensued. We do have a private health care plan / insurance. My contract almost certainly will say sick == SSP only.
It's weird - it is a really generous company in many other aspects - health benefits (dental / optical / hospital stays etc), good work's parties, plenty eat / drink events (we got a ticking off from HMRC because as a company we sere spending too much on entertainments for staff). but sick pay - no, it's really, really stingy.
[[ html fix - mod ]]
]]>Any staff member with COVID-19 will be eligible for SSP from day 1. SSP == (Government) Statutory Sick Pay from welfare system, £94.25 per week.
Some of our devs are in the 30k bracket, normally taking home £2k/m after tax - SSP would be a huge hit.
Generous much ?
]]>Any staff member with COVID-19 will be eligible for SSP from day 1. SSP == (Government) Statutory Sick Pay from welfare system, £94.25 per week.
Some of our devs are in the 30k bracket, normally taking home £2k/m after tax - SSP would be a huge hit.
Generous much ?
]]>[1] Hah !
]]>It reads: The severity of an incident is measured by the number of rules broken in resolving it.
The whole list bears reading a few times, I reckon.
]]>