No toads were licked (or felched) in the making of this comment.
]]>"Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were fucking off."
]]>I would like to understand where that person was coming from. Did he or she just wake up in the morning thinking "We must stop those toad-felching pornographers"?
Does Rule 34 apply here? Searching for "toad felching porn" gives false positives that have nothing to do with toads, but if I instead search for '"toad felching" porn' I only get hits on this page and copies of it.
]]>Paragraph 63(7)(d) "An image falls within this subsection if it portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, any of the following - . . . a person performing an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive), and a reasonable person looking at the image would think that any such person or animal was real."
Yes, I know that is image, not text, but that's crossed over into censorship. Exactly WHAT harm is done if one possesses pictures of people shagging dead sheep or felching dead toads? Let alone computer-simulated pictures of such activities? There is absolutely no justification of protection, not even of the animals concerned. It's not yet illegal to describe such behaviour, but just you wait :-(
]]>" Lonely shepherd found dead 'after having sex with scarecrow that he'd dressed in wig and lipstick' "
This sort of thing always causes me to smile like a fiend when I come upon news references to appeals - legalisticaly phrased - appeals to “The International Community”
We, over here in the U.K. are in the midst of this sort of Stuff in the most peculiar political election campaign since... err, the last one?.. and so need no explanation, but, in the event that you, in say, the US of A, are interested just type “uk politics country sports and sex" into a web search and be prepared to laugh at our expense.
]]>If so then what happens if one partner in a sexual congress is standing at one side of an International Border between states and the other partner is at the other side of the border?
What happens if the age of either participant changes as they move? What about time zones?
What happens if, in the throes of passion they perform various sexual acts at either side of the border?
These things are Important and we should be Told and advised lest we slip into Error.
Just come upon this...
http://www.ageofconsent.com/uscitizens.htm
The fine print is a bit off putting but really it is worth a look and a giggle...that is to say we should mull upon these matters in a grave and thoughtful manner.
The law as it applies to Toads is probably even more complicated and risible.
Not that anyone here is laughing! Perish the thought!
]]>My train of thought once I saw the slate certainly read like the output of DR :-/
]]>http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents
Paragraph 80 allows an author (who has asserted his rights) to object to its publication by means of CleanReader. Paragraph 103(2) allows him to apply to the courts for a "Who's been a naughty boy, then?" order, requiring the CleanReader publisher to declare that the author isn't happy.
Aw, gee!
]]>Scary. Particularly if there are no other sanctions. I expect Clean Reader are quaking in their boots...
]]>