RohanV
- Website: blessingofkings.blogspot.com
Recent Actions
-
Commented on They Took Our Myths
I'm not sure I agree with this. If this was true, we should see more mythic universes in play from before the 20th century. And we don't really have those. Off-hand, in the English tradition there's Arthurian legends, some Shakespearean...
Comment Threads
-
1000kindsofrain commented on
They Took Our Myths
Yeah, it's very mashupable. I think it's because in most long running sagas the heroes pollute the mythos. Could you write a Dalek story without the Doctor turning up? And the significance of Winchesters in the Supernatural universe has become an in joke. But in Lovecraft, the progagonists are ephemeral cannon fodder. So it's tailor made for franchising. I don't know if Hellraiser is where you're going, but doesn't that have much the same property? (I haven't read enough Barker to know if he's stitched together a complete mythos outside of that.) But your comic did make sense as something...
-
J Thomas commented on
They Took Our Myths
My reflex response to bad knowledge is Snow Crash. Or even, the Ring films. I'm sorry, I didn't get that. And it looks like it will be interesting. My teachers used to say not to be afraid of looking stupid by asking questions, if you don't understand it lots of others won't. Hardly anybody ever asked when they didn't understand something, though. But I'm asking now....
-
Hugh Hancock commented on
They Took Our Myths
Just to round this one out - I wrote up a short piece discussing some of the points that have been raised here and elsewhere about the original article (Fanfic, archetypes, open culture) and stuck it over at http://www.strangecompany.org/further-comment-they-took-our-myths/ It's been fascinating, everyone - thank you. I've had a lot of food for thought (and future blog posts) over the course of this discussion!...
-
1000kindsofrain commented on
They Took Our Myths
Long weekend. And my answer's not going to be interesting or worth the wait; it's just a loose thematic grouping. The Lovecraftian stereotype is of a hero driven "mad" by reading a book. I can't recall that actually happening; Lovecraft's occult tomes are generally conduits to experiences, and it's the experiences which trigger the breakdowns not the words. (I'll have overlooked something obvious.) But I read Hugh as wondering whether that was possible. And Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash is all about words that can involuntarily reprogram the brain. I've no notes so I'll relay Wikipedia's ersatz distillation: ...Stephenson describes [Summerians]...
-
J Thomas commented on
They Took Our Myths
Thank you for replying! I'm glad to fit that together now, and I don't feel the least bit bothered that I didn't understand it from your other post. Particularly when there was lots of LOTR references recently to confuse the Ring films with....
Following
Not following anyone
Buy my Books
Quick Stuff
Specials
- Common Misconceptions About Publishing—a series of essays about the industry I work in.
- How I Got Here In The End —my non-writing autobiography, or what I did before becoming a full-time writer.
- Unwirer—an experiment in weblog mediated collaborative fiction.
- Shaping the Future—a talk I gave on the social implications of Moore's Law.
- Japan: first impressions — or, what I did on my holidays
- Inside the MIT Media Lab—what it’s like to spend a day wandering around the Media Lab.
- The High Frontier, Redux — space colonization: feasible or futile?
- “Nothing like this will be built again”—inside a nuclear reactor complex.
- Old blog—2003-2006 (RIP)
Merchandise
About This Page
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.