
Raymond Camden
- Website: www.raymondcamden.com
Recent Actions
-
Commented on An Apology
As others have said - no need to apologize - but a big thank you for the update. I absolutely loved the Merchant Princes and the update was great to see....

Comment Threads
-
Nojay commented on
An Apology
So how much actual fusion has Polywell, backed by the US Navy, demonstrated? Focus Fusion? Muon catalysis? The Joint European Torus (JET) ran a fusion campaign twenty years ago that yielded 22MJ of fusion energy in a 1.5 second burst with a Q of about 0.6 i.e it took about 35MJ of input to get that 22MJ of fusion energy out. The ITER tokamak is being designed to produce 500MW thermal output for 50MW of input, sustainable for thousands of seconds. That's a Q figure of 10 and a big step on the roadmap towards a commercial fusion generating station,...
-
Nojay commented on
An Apology
The "vested interests" aren't interested in developing a fission reactor concept like molten-salt fuel transport because they want to spend their money building proven reactors that will produce electricity at about 5c/kWh for at least half a century. I notice you didn't, like most other folks who boost the molten-salt concept, conflate it with thorium breeding. Thank you. I've lost count of the number of people who have breathlessly told me that the US had a for-reals! LFTR working in the 1960s and it was the evull nuclear weapons people who put the kibosh on it for nefarious purposes. As...
-
Mariner commented on
An Apology
Though a fully-functioning LFTR would be the ideal, I think you're correct about the difficulty of getting one developed, especially as the nuclear industry is dead set on building iterations of PWRs. For this reason, I know that some proponents of MSRs are promoting other designs such as the Denatured Molten Salt Reactor. Some of the benefits of an LFTR (chiefly in lack of complexity in comparison to some of the other Gen IV reactors and inherent safety due to operation at atmospheric pressure), but using Uranium along with Thorium and with no attempt to reprocess the fuel. The idea...
-
Greg. Tingey commented on
An Apology
Must disagree ... The rabid anti-nuclear movement were not even half-discredited in this country until at least half-way through the coalition guvmint. And they are still out there, screaming & moaning, every time anyone even mentions the word "nuclear" Oddly enough Osborne actually understands technical investment for the future - the first chancellor to do so for a very long time - oddly enough, because of his family firm's business ... he understands that, even in a Paint-&-Wallpapers company, you need state-of-the art presses & industrial chemists & that you can't just turn the tap off & on at random....
-
Nojay commented on
An Apology
Molten-salt reactors are actually much more complex than light-water, heavy-water, fast spectrum and other commercial reactors being operated and built today. In their case the fuel stays still and coolant is circulated around it, boiling-kettle steam-engine simple. The coolant (gas, water, steam, sodium, whatever) doesn't pick up any contamination from waste isotopes in the jacketed fuel and at the end of each operating cycle the fuel pins containing all the waste materials produced are removed and stored to be buried or reprocessed after the short-halflife actinides have decayed. At end of life the reactor structures are only slightly radioactive from...

Following
Not following anyone
Buy my Books
Quick Stuff
Specials
- Common Misconceptions About Publishing—a series of essays about the industry I work in.
- How I Got Here In The End —my non-writing autobiography, or what I did before becoming a full-time writer.
- Unwirer—an experiment in weblog mediated collaborative fiction.
- Shaping the Future—a talk I gave on the social implications of Moore's Law.
- Japan: first impressions — or, what I did on my holidays
- Inside the MIT Media Lab—what it’s like to spend a day wandering around the Media Lab.
- The High Frontier, Redux — space colonization: feasible or futile?
- “Nothing like this will be built again”—inside a nuclear reactor complex.
- Old blog—2003-2006 (RIP)
Merchandise
About This Page
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.