Custos Sophiae
Recent Actions
-
Commented on An age-old question
Fantasies quite often have immortal humans whose ageing has magically been stopped. Most of them don't seem to consider the implications of this for the way these immortals think, but a few do. I don't have the quote to hand,...
Comment Threads
-
zarzuelazen commented on
An age-old question
Other folks have tried developing methane/LOX engines but they've not been particularly successful hence the current fleet of commercial and government launchers based around RP-1/LOX, LH/LOX and solid motors. No, fully working methane/LOX engines for space flight haven't been developed before - until SpaceX started to develop the Raptor engine, which is a methane/LOX engine. Methane/LOX offers some advantages in terms of Isp over existing mixes but methane engines tend to coke up, break turbine blades and the like. Methane also has downsides in handling, storage and tankerage and it's less dense than RP-1 meaning bulkier and heavier vehicle structures...
-
Nojay commented on
An age-old question
The Shuttle had a flexible cargo bay capable of carrying an additional 20-tonne payload, a manipulator arm, airlocks and suit support for multiple EVAs, up to 18 tonnes of fuel and oxidiser for significant cross-range capability in-orbit and enough life-support to keep a crew of seven in orbit for a couple of weeks or a smaller crew for up to a month (never actually done in practice). It also had a toilet and a shower. Dragon X and Orion have plastic bags, diapers and wet wipes, just like the good old (very old now) Mercury/Gemini/Apollo days. They don't have the...
-
Vanzetti commented on
An age-old question
The shuttle was a giant White Elephant with a horribly convoluted design. There was nothing it did that couldn't be done much cheaper....
-
David L commented on
An age-old question
Yes. It was Congress telling NASA and the US military how to build a single vehicle for wildly divergent uses and the only way anything was going to get approved was to lie about the costs and benefits. Think of Congress telling the US navy that to save money in the future they must combine ballistic missile subs with aircraft carriers and have a single vessel for both missions. I'm still skeptical that the F-35 will actually be cheaper in total costs than separate overall designs for the Air Force, Marines, and Navy. Been tried and failed multiple times over...
-
Bellinghman commented on
An age-old question
combine ballistic missile subs with aircraft carriers Sort of like an update of the Japanese I-400 class subs? (Okay, okay, they had torpedoes rather than ICBMs which weren't around in the early 1940s. And their aircraft complement was somewhat small by surface carrier standards. And anyway carrier groups are pretty obvious even if you can't see the carrier in the middle. And your general point is totally valid, it's just that sometimes it seems there's no idea so crazy someone hasn't tried it.)...
Following
Not following anyone
Buy my Books
Quick Stuff
Specials
- Common Misconceptions About Publishing—a series of essays about the industry I work in.
- How I Got Here In The End —my non-writing autobiography, or what I did before becoming a full-time writer.
- Unwirer—an experiment in weblog mediated collaborative fiction.
- Shaping the Future—a talk I gave on the social implications of Moore's Law.
- Japan: first impressions — or, what I did on my holidays
- Inside the MIT Media Lab—what it’s like to spend a day wandering around the Media Lab.
- The High Frontier, Redux — space colonization: feasible or futile?
- “Nothing like this will be built again”—inside a nuclear reactor complex.
- Old blog—2003-2006 (RIP)
Merchandise
About This Page
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.